ഫലകം:Better source
ഫലകത്തിന്റെ വിവരണംUsage
തിരുത്തുകThis template is used in articles to identify sentences or short passages with information or analysis that has one or more inline citations but which are to insufficiently reliable sources. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:
- Most people believe in ghosts.[1][better source needed]
You can also include a |reason= note, which displays as a tooltip upon mouse hover, to leave a better record for future editors. For example, the following usage might be appropriate to the arguable claim that "Most people believe in ghosts...":
{{Better source|reason=Citation is the Ghostbusters' company website; there must be more objective sources for this.|date=ഡിസംബർ 2024}}
General template for copy-pasting:
{{Better source|date=ഡിസംബർ 2024}}
Adding this template to an article places the article into Category:All articles lacking reliable references or one of its dated subcategories, all part of a collection of categories identifying articles with reliable-sourcing issues. To find all such articles, see Category:Wikipedia articles with sourcing issues.
When not to use
തിരുത്തുകContentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately. Do not tag it: remove it. For more information, see the section on contentious material in the Biography of Living Persons policy.
Material which is doubtful and harmful may be removed immediately, rather than tagged. See Wikipedia:Citing sources § Unsourced material.
If no citation is given, use the {{Citation needed}} tag instead. If the source given is self-published, use {{Self-published inline}}. If you think the author has a conflict of interest or is otherwise too close to the subject, use {{Third-party inline}}. If the source has been surpassed by a newer, reliable publications that no longer support the claim in the article, use {{Obsolete source}}.
If you have the time and ability to find a better reference, please do so. Then correct the citation yourself, or correct the article text. After all, the ultimate goal is not to merely identify problems, but to fix them.
Template data
തിരുത്തുകTemplateData for Better source
This template is used in articles to identify sentences or short passages with information or analysis that has one or more inline citations but which are to insufficiently reliable sources. It produces the super-scripted text "better source needed".
| ചരം | വിവരണം | തരം | സ്ഥിതി | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reason | reason | A reason as to why, or for what content, a better citation is needed.
| പദം | ഐച്ഛികം |
| Month and year | date | Provides the month and year of when the template was placed.
| തീയതി | നിർദ്ദേശിക്കുന്നവ |
See also
തിരുത്തുക- {{Unreliable source?}}, inline template to flag a citation to work the reliability of which is questioned but uncertain
- {{Cite check}}, article/section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations
- {{Additional citations needed}}, the present source is insufficient but should be retained
- {{Refimprove}}, article/section has weak or incomplete sources/references/citations
- {{Nonspecific}}, a reference is too imprecise or ambiguous to enable it to be verified
- {{Unreferenced}}, article/section has no sources/references/citations given at all
- Wikipedia:Citing sources, especially § Unsourced material
- Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup § Verifiability and sources
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
| മുകളിൽ കാണുന്ന വിവരണം ഫലകം:Better source/doc എന്ന ഉപതാളിൽ നിന്ന് ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തിയിട്ടുള്ളതാണ്. (തിരുത്തുക | നാൾവഴി) താങ്കൾക്ക് പരീക്ഷണങ്ങൾ ഫലകത്തിന്റെ എഴുത്തുകളരി (നിർമ്മിക്കുക) താളിലോ testcases (നിർമ്മിക്കുക) താളിലോ നടത്താവുന്നതാണ്‌. ദയവായി വർഗ്ഗങ്ങളും ബഹുഭാഷാകണ്ണികളും /വിവരണം ഉപതാളിൽ മാത്രം ഇടുക. ഈ ഫലകത്തിന്റെ ഉപതാളുകൾ. |
- ↑ Hayes, Daniel. "27 Statistics That Prove Americans Believe in Ghosts". Retrieved 2016-12-06.