"ബുദ്ധിപൂർവ്വമായ രൂപസംവിധാനം" എന്ന താളിന്റെ പതിപ്പുകൾ തമ്മിലുള്ള വ്യത്യാസം
Content deleted Content added
(ചെ.) യന്ത്രം: അക്ഷരപിശകുകൾ ശരിയാക്കുന്നു |
No edit summary |
||
വരി 1:
{{prettyurl|Intelligent design}}
[[Image:MontreGousset001.jpg|thumbnail|right|ബുദ്ധിപൂർവ്വമായ രൂപസംവിധാനം എന്ന നിരൂപണത്തെ ചിത്രീകരിക്കാൻ സാധാരണയായി ഉപയോഗിക്കപ്പെടാറുള്ള ഒരു ചിത്രം.]]
[[പ്രപഞ്ചം|പ്രപഞ്ചത്തിന്റെയും]] [[ജീവൻ|ജീവരൂപങ്ങളുടെയും]]
|url=http://www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php#questionsAboutIntelligentDesign
|title=Top Questions-1.What is the theory of intelligent design?
Line 22 ⟶ 23:
|year=2007
|accessdate=2007-05-13
}}</ref><ref name="Numbers 373">[[#Numbers 2006|Numbers 2006]], p. 373; "[ID] captured headlines for its bold attempt to rewrite the basic rules of science and its claim to have found indisputable evidence of a God-like being. Proponents, however, insisted it was 'not a religious-based idea, but instead an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins – one that challenges strictly materialistic views of evolution.' Although the intellectual roots of the design argument go back centuries, its contemporary incarnation dates from the 1980s"</ref><ref name="Meyer 2005">{{cite news |last=Meyer |first=Stephen C. |authorlink=Stephen C. Meyer |date=December 1, 2005 |title=Not by chance |url=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/issuesideas/story.html?id=8f7f51f2-a196-4677-9399-46f4f17b5b61 |newspaper=[[National Post]] |location=Don Mills, Ontario |publisher=[[Canwest|CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc.]] |accessdate=2014-02-28 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060501021540/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/issuesideas/story.html?id=8f7f51f2-a196-4677-9399-46f4f17b5b61 |archivedate=May 1, 2006}}</ref><ref name="Boudry 2010">{{cite journal |last1=Boudry |first1=Maarten |authorlink1=Maarten Boudry |last2=Blancke |first2=Stefaan |last3=Braeckman |first3=Johan |authorlink3=Johan Braeckman |date=December 2010 |title=Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience |journal=[[The Quarterly Review of Biology]] |volume=85 |issue=4 |pages=473–482 |doi=10.1086/656904 |pmid=21243965|url=https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/952482/file/6828579.pdf |hdl=1854/LU-952482 }} Article available from [https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/952482 Universiteit Gent]</ref><ref>[[#Pigliucci 2010|Pigliucci 2010]]</ref><ref>[[#Young & Edis 2004|Young & Edis 2004]] pp. 195-196, Section heading: But is it Pseudoscience?</ref> ഇത് അന്തിമമായി ശാസ്ത്രവിഷയമല്ലാത്ത [[സൃഷ്ടിവാദം]] തന്നെയാണ്, പക്ഷെ ദൈവത്തിന്റെ വിശദാംശങ്ങൾ മനപ്പൂർവം ഒഴിവാക്കുകയും ശാസ്ത്രീയ തൊങ്ങലുകൾ ഉപയോഗിച്ച് ഒരു കപടശാസ്ത്രമായി രൂപപ്പെടുത്തുകയും ചെയ്തിരിക്കുന്നു.<ref>
{{vcite book
|last=Numbers
Line 33 ⟶ 34:
|isbn=0674023390
}}
</ref> ഈ
''"Q. Has the Discovery Institute been a leader in the intelligent design movement? A. Yes, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Q. And are almost all of the individuals who are involved with the intelligent design movement associated with the Discovery Institute? A. All of the leaders are, yes."'' [[Barbara Forrest]], 2005, testifying in the [[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]] trial. {{vcite web
Line 97 ⟶ 98:
}}
</ref>
"the writings of leading ID proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity". {{cite court
| |||