"ഗോലാൻ കുന്നുകൾ" എന്ന താളിന്റെ പതിപ്പുകൾ തമ്മിലുള്ള വ്യത്യാസം

* "Israeli-occupied Golan Heights" (Central Intelligence Agency. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pqanFyF6nI0C&pg=PA339&dq=%22OCCUPIED+GOLAN%22&hl=en&ei=T2BVTJuyLsH48AbYwM3kBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=%22OCCUPIED%20GOLAN%22&f=false CIA World Factbook 2010], Skyhorse Publishing Inc., 2009. pg. 339. ISBN 1-60239-727-9.)

* "...the United States considers the Golan Heights to be occupied territory subject to negotiation and Israeli withdrawal..." ([http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9570.pdf "CRS Issue Brief for Congress: Israeli-United States Relations"], Congressional Research Service, April 5, 2002. pg. 5. Retrieved August 1, 2010.)

* "In the ICRC's view, the Golan is an occupied territory." ([http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/israel-golan-311207?OpenDocument&style=custo_print ICRC activities in the occupied Golan during 2007], International Committee of the Red Cross, April 24, 2008.)</ref><ref name=KORMAN>Korman, Sharon. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ueDO1dJyjrUC&pg=PA261&dq=The+right+of+conquest+golan+heights&hl=en&ei=AzpYTMLXE4mhOPufvPEI&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=The%20right%20of%20conquest%20golan%20heights&f=false The right of conquest: the acquisition of territory by force in international law and practice], Oxford University Press, 1996. pg. 265. ISBN 0-19-828007-6. "The continued occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights is recognized by many states as valid and consistent with the provisions of the United Nations Charter, on a self-defence basis. Israel, on this view, would be entitled to exact as a condition of withdrawal from the territory the imposition of security measures of an indefinite character--such as perpetual demilitarization, or the emplacement of a United Nations force--which would ensure, or tend to ensure, that the territory would not be used against it for aggression on future occasions. But the notion that Israel is entitled to claim any status other than that of belligerent occupant in the territory which it occupies, or to act beyond the strict bounds laid down in the Fourth Geneva Convention, has been universally rejected by the international community--no less by the United States than by any other state."</ref>