തോമസ് കുൻ
അമേരിക്കൻ ഊർജ്ജതന്ത്രജ്ഞനും ദാർശനികനുമായിരുന്നു തോമസ് കുൻ.(ജൂലൈ 18, 1922 – ജൂൺ 17, 1996).ശാസ്ത്രചരിത്ര വിജ്ഞാനം,ശാസ്ത്രതത്വങ്ങളുടെ ആവിർഭാവം എന്നിവയിൽ ആഴത്തിലുള്ള പഠനം നടത്തിയിട്ടുണ്ട്.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions എന്നതാണ് പ്രധാനകൃതി.
പ്രമാണം:Thomas Kuhn.jpg | |
ജനനം | Thomas Samuel Kuhn ജൂലൈ 18, 1922 Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S. |
---|---|
മരണം | ജൂൺ 17, 1996 Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. | (പ്രായം 73)
കാലഘട്ടം | 20th-century philosophy |
പ്രദേശം | Western philosophy |
ചിന്താധാര | Analytic Historical turn[1] |
പ്രധാന താത്പര്യങ്ങൾ | Philosophy of science |
ശ്രദ്ധേയമായ ആശയങ്ങൾ | |
സ്വാധീനിക്കപ്പെട്ടവർ |
അവലംബങ്ങൾ
തിരുത്തുക- ↑ K. Brad Wray, Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology, Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 87.
- ↑ Thomas Kuhn (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): "Not all the achievements of the preceding period of normal science are preserved in a revolution, and indeed a later period of science may find itself without an explanation for a phenomenon that in an earlier period was held to be successfully explained. This feature of scientific revolutions has become known as 'Kuhn-loss'". The term was coined by Heinz R. Post in Post, H. R. (1971), "Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics," Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 213–255.
- ↑ Aviezer Tucker (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, Blackwell Publishing, 2011 : "Analytic Realism".
- ↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 48.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 44.
- ↑ Robert J. Richards, Lorraine Daston (eds.), Kuhn's 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions' at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic, University of Chicago Press, 2016, p. 47.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. vi.
- ↑ Burman, J. T. (2007). "Piaget No 'Remedy' for Kuhn, But the Two Should be Read Together: Comment on Tsou's 'Piaget vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress'". Theory & Psychology. 17 (5): 721–732. doi:10.1177/0959354307079306.
- ↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 146.
- ↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 27.
- ↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 85.