2. Jigesh removing AFD template from an article
I put AFD template on an article സംഗീതം because the content of the article has an obnoxious religious slant. Among other thing the content presumes that the readers of the article are Hindus with an inclusive നാം (we). I had earlier notified the editor who made the objectionable additions about the nonencyclopedic nature of her contributions. I had also questioned the religious bias of her articles.
The user showed no improvement and I put the AFD template on the article. Jigesh unilaterally chose to remove the AFD without discussion. No discussion, no enlightening edit summary, and above all no change in the content. This is disruption. On the other hand he tried to summarily deal with a contributor whom he seems to dislike because the editor doesn't conform to his pov. [[User:Sajetpa]] added two qutoes to [[ഇന്ത്യന് ജമാ അത്തെ ഇസ്ലാമി]]. The validity of the quotes (apparently to eulogise the organisation) is moot . However, what Jigesh did was to remove the new addition with two already existing quotes. He didn't discuss his removal, didn't talk to Sajetpa. The existing quotes were very much in place in the article. In short, he is ready to tamper with an AFD to push his pov while he vandalises content on articles which are not to his liking.
A discussion should take place on the subject. It is the responsibility of the active users to participate in discussion. I would also like to remind all that head count is not what matters. Since the admins baulk at bold decisions, I will take it upon myself to remove any disruptive comments posted in this section. [[ഉപയോക്താവ്:Calicuter|Calicuter]] 05:23, 24 ജൂലൈ 2007 (UTC)
അപ്പോള് ഈ പ്രശ്നത്തില് ഒരു പരിഹാരം ആയല്ലോ. ഡീ സിസോപ്പ് പോയിട്ട് അതിനുള്ള വോട്ടെടുപ്പ് പോലും വേണ്ട എന്ന് ഭൂരിപക്ഷം പേരും സമ്മതിച്ച സ്ഥിതിക്ക് എല്ലാവരും ഈ പേജില് സംവാദം എഴുത്ത് നിറുത്ത് ലേഖനം എഴുത്ത് തുടരുക. അടുത്ത സംവാദവുമായി അടുത്ത ആള് വരും വരെ. --[[ഉപയോക്താവ്:Shijualex|Shiju Alex]] 09:15, 24 ജൂലൈ 2007 (UTC)