"വിക്കിപീഡിയ:Volunteer response team" എന്ന താളിന്റെ പതിപ്പുകൾ തമ്മിലുള്ള വ്യത്യാസം

If you disagree with an edit whose summary or log referenced an OTRS ticket, the OTRS team strongly recommends that you contact the editor responsible prior to reverting, as the editor may be in possession of confidential information that should not be published on a public site such as Wikipedia. Doing this initiates the OTRS review procedures, which are (in order) as follows:

#Contact the editor who made their change, preferably by e-mail. Private correspondence provides slightly more latitude for the OTRS editor to discuss privacy-related issues in confidence (which they otherwise be unable to present for the wider public on-wiki), or on their user talk page.

#If you disagree with the resulting view, it is encouraged that you open a [[WP:RFC|requests for comment]] on the issue. All Wikipedia edits must be supported by [[WP:CON|consensus]]; if a consensus exists after a reasonable time period at the RfC to undo the edits made in response to the OTRS ticket, then such edits should naturally be undone. Please note that the material should not be restored until <u>''after''</u> a consensus to support exists at the requests for comment, and that in certain cases full details will not be able to be posted on-wiki. The definition of "reasonable time period" should be more conservative than what would otherwise be expected for such proceedings, and in particular should allow sufficient time for the original OTRS respondent(s) to provide a statement.

#Ultimately, all English Wikipedia-based actions of OTRS volunteers, just like those of all editors, are open to the scrutiny of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] in its role as the final stage of [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] on the English Wikipedia and as the body responsible for handling non-public information and privacy related issues on that wiki. If a request for comment is unable to fully resolve the dispute, and the reason for the action includes non-public information, then the Committee should be asked to look at the non-public aspects, before a final decision is made.