"വിക്കിപീഡിയ:നയങ്ങളും മാർഗ്ഗരേഖകളും" എന്ന താളിന്റെ പതിപ്പുകൾ തമ്മിലുള്ള വ്യത്യാസം

വരി 109:
Because Wikipedia practice exists in the community through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]], editing a policy/guideline/essay page does not in itself imply an immediate change to accepted practice. It is, naturally, bad practice to recommend a rejected practice on a policy or guideline page. To update best practices, you may change the practice directly ([[WP:WIARM|you are permitted to deviate from practice for the purposes of such change]]) and/or set about building widespread consensus for your change or implementation through discussion. When such a change is accepted, you can then edit the page to reflect the new situation.
 
====കാര്യമായ മാറ്റങ്ങൾ====
====Substantive changes====
 
'''Talkആദ്യം firstചർച്ച ചെയ്യുകയാണോ വേണ്ടത്.''' Talk page discussion typically precedes substantive changes to policy. Changes may be made if there are no objections, or if discussion shows that there is consensus for the change. Minor edits to improve formatting, grammar, and clarity may be made at any time.
 
If the result of discussions is unclear, then it should be evaluated by an administrator or other independent editor, as in the proposal process. Major changes should also be publicized to the community in general; announcements similar to the proposal process may be appropriate.
വരി 117:
If wider input on a proposed change is desired, it may be useful to mark the section with the tag {{tlx|underdiscussion|section|talk<nowiki>=</nowiki>''Discussion Title''}}. (If the proposal relates to a single statement, use {{tlx|underdiscussion-inline|''Discussion Title''}} immediately after it.)
{{shortcut|WP:PGBOLD}}
'''Orഅതോ be boldധൈര്യശാലിയാകുകയാണോ.''' The older but still valid method is to boldly edit the page. [[Wikipedia:Be bold|Bold]] editors of policy and guideline pages are strongly encouraged to follow [[WP:1RR]] or [[WP:0RR]] standards. Although most editors find advance discussion, especially at well-developed pages, very helpful, [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Process|directly editing these pages is permitted by Wikipedia's policies]]. Consequently, you should not remove any change ''solely'' on the grounds that there was no formal discussion indicating consensus for the change before it was made. Instead, you should give a substantive reason for challenging it and, if one hasn't already been started, open a discussion to identify the community's current views.
 
Editing a policy to support your own argument in an active discussion may be seen as [[Wikipedia:gaming the system|gaming the system]], especially if you do not disclose your involvement in the argument when making the edits.